| Comments |
| 10/23/2013 8:27:26 AM |
Bob Denny |
|
| 10/23/2013 8:23:05 AM |
Bob Denny |
|
| 10/23/2013 8:10:07 AM |
Bob Denny |
Ken Pendlebury found a regression! I was testing the plate scale within the WCS refinement loop, and there is can vary around as the WCS and the distortion is iterated. I had to relax the test within the loop and apply the tighter test after that process completes! |
| 9/24/2013 3:56:54 PM |
Bob Denny |
|
| 9/24/2013 2:21:22 PM |
Bob Denny |
Narrow it again! Now 75% to 125%. Regression tests show that this wikll virtually eliminate falsies. The PSF + RemoveHotPix version of Test1 was producing ome false solutions, they are gone. |
| 9/15/2013 12:19:40 PM |
Bob Denny |
Cut the tolerance to 0.5 to 2 from 0.25 to 4. Changed the plate scale error message to be a hint. |
| 9/15/2013 9:50:38 AM |
Bob Denny |
Accumulating time under the "too many false solutions" ticket. |
| 9/15/2013 8:50:51 AM |
Bob Denny |
Doing it in field_compare.cpp was a total loser. I left the code there, but commented out. See those comments. |
| 8/27/2013 9:30:40 AM |
Bob Denny |
What I would LIKE to do is for this test to be included in the initial search for a solution, as the last criterion (after all of the other possible rejections for a solution). |
| 8/27/2013 9:29:11 AM |
Bob Denny |
Ha ha, this logic is already in the engine, but the limits may be WAY too wide! |